The Top 10 Films of the Year:
10.) Bunkraku (Dir. Guy Moshe; Starring: Josh Hartnett, Demi Moore, Woody Harrelson, Ron Perlman; U.S.)
Undoubtedly the most obscure pick on this list, I hadn’t even heard of this indie martial arts Western until a friend showed me a bootleg on his laptop. Though debuting in 2010 at the Toronto International Film Festival, Bunraku didn’t see even a theatrical release until a year later, and it’s not hard to see why. It bends and blends genres to such a degree that Tarantino would be perplexed, plays like a centuries old Japanese revenge story, as told through a spaghetti Western as remade in a sci-fi dystopian film shot in India. The film is the kind of surreal, wild thrill ride that goes on to become a cult hit, and I’ve never hoped such a fate for any film more than Bunraku. Undoubtedly one of the year’s most unique entries.
Why are you not watching this movie already? |
9.) Kung-Fu Panda 2 (Dir. Jennifer Yuh Nelson; Starring: Jack Black, Angelina Jolie, Gary Oldman, Dustin Hoffman; U.S.)
I can already feel your ire, dear reader, that I cast aside other film candy (GWTDT, Drive, The Help, War Horse) and instead give praise to a cartoon sequel. But I encourage you to withhold judgment until you see the film. Yes, the story may be a tad predictable, but such is the state of the modern kung-fu movie. And the delight of Kung-Fu Panda 2 (unlike its more cutesy, “everyone’s special” first installment) is that it is, in fact, a kung-fu movie. It’s simply animated, and using anthropomorphic animals. But simply because it’s accessible to children doesn’t mean it’s geared towards them. The film has a stylish sensibility to it, incorporating exquisite traditional Japanese animation styles mixed in with its 3-D computer animation, and tells a tale of revenge and self-discovery that has pervaded the martial arts film for decades, without ever fully succumbing to kids film clichés. The film’s highlight is the animation, of course, but credit must be given to its voice cast, who commit to the emotion of the characters (Gary Oldman, as usual, puts in way more effort than necessary, turning in a performance as Lord Shen as great as any in recent memory). In a year of bland sequels, this one is miles above the original.
Just...trust me. It really is one of the best of the year. |
8.) X-Men: First Class (Dir. Matthew Vaughn; Starring: James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, Kevin Bacon, January Jones; U.S.)
In the years between Batman films, Marvel truly gets a chance to shine, especially in the time building up towards their unprecedented, all-or-nothing extravaganza The Avengers. So it would come as a huge shock to many that, in a summer with not one but two Avengers-related films (Thor and Captain America), the most thrilling and refined comic book film of the year was the one no one was excited for. Well, folks, we all learned to never judge a film by its trailer once this smartly written, sharply filmed and sleekly acted origin story unfolded on the screen. This was Michael Fassbender’s year, and he proved he could carry a blockbuster with the best of them in his household-name-making turn as Erik Lensherr (later to become Magneto), a suave, intelligent, pre-Daniel Craig Bond-eqsue mutant on a mission. Yes, January Jones was blander than a modern X-Men comic without Wolverine (whose cameo, by the way, made up for the atrocious X-Men Origins: Wolverine), but the rest of the cast holds their own, especially Atonement’s McAvoy, who embodies Xavier fully with the youthful spirit one could always see a glimmer of in Patrick Stewart’s eye. Yes, Nolan showed us that a great comic book movie can be dark and brooding, but First Class reminds us that it doesn’t have to be.
"Ok, he may have gotten to be in a Tarantino film, but I got to hook up with Kiera Knightley. Oh, he was in A Dangerous Method? Damn it!" |
Often times, when we go to the movies and see a great film, we lay back in our seats and go “Wow”. We let the waves of the experience wash over us in our minds as the credits roll and instantly know we’ve seen something unique and incredible. But every once and a while, a great film will slip through the cracks of our perception. Like great modern art or some deceptively vague song lyrics from the likes of Leonard Cohen, certain films’ adept grace and piercing depth will allude us upon first viewing, and we’ll cast it off as “ok” or “dull”. Whether it’s the pacing or the style, or even dialogue which seems “aloof” or characters that seem “unreal”, a film won’t truly click for a viewer for some time. Martha Marcy May Marlene is one of those films that, while seemingly slow or ill-made upon first viewing, seeps its way into the crevices of your consciousness, in no small part due to the haunting performance of Elizabeth Olsen. Every aspect, from the pacing to the shot choices to the acting, over time one sees as deliberate, each moment planned and aimed for a certain lingering, haunting effect. Martha Marcy May Marlene is cinematic pointillism. While watching the film, in all it’s ambiguity and sluggishness, it’s as though our faces are pressed against the canvas of Seurat's “A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte”. It is only with distance that we can take in the beauty.
Ever think you'd be saying "That Olsen sister got robbed of an Oscar"? |
A studio-produced animated film that didn’t pander to children. A psychedelic masterpiece that beats the 3rd Harold & Kumar for “Stoner Film of the Year”. A Western-infused, kid-friendly surrealist piece that works like “My First Jodorowsky”. The praise can be heaped on the delightfully strange Rango, whose style and humor don’t just avoid kids film clichés, they do a Mexican hat dance around them. From cameos ranging from Hunter S. Thompson (with Johnny Depp reprising his role as the late doctor of journalism) to the brilliant “Spirit of the West”, as portrayed in a pitch perfect voice by Timothy Olyphant; to bizarre one-liners (“I once found a whole human spinal cord in my fecal matter.”), Verbinsky’s world of rodents and lizards is a head-trip I’d gladly take again and again.
Mommy, who's Dr. Gonzo? Is he related to the Muppet? |
Like Van Gogh’s "Starry Night", one wonders, when Lars Von Trier takes on a genre, whether he’s subverting it consciously, or if this is simply how he perceives it, and is earnestly replicating what he sees when he looks at it. Perhaps when Von Trier watches a typical musical like The Sound of Music, he sees Dancer in the Dark. Perhaps to him, Antichrist is just like any other horror film. I like to hope so, because it makes me believe that Von Trier was watching some typical sci-fi apocalyptic dreck like Armageddon when he concocted the idea for the gorgeous, serenely unsettling Melancholia. With Kirsten Dunst giving a career-best performance as Justine, a woman in the depths of depression, the film explores the tranquility of hopelessness and evokes both the tragic overtones of the tragedy of Tristan and Isolde as well as the dreamy quality of Bunuel’s Un Chien Andalou by its masterful utilization of the Wagner Prelude which oft-accompanies both. To explain or dissect Melancholia is to do it a disservice. It is a film to be experienced, and a highlight for both Dunst and Von Trier that was shamefully ignored by the major awards.
Lars, do more of these, and less Hitler jokes, and you might just be alright. |
I make no effort to hide my admiration of Woody Allen, but I also make no effort to hide the fact that he hasn’t had a hit since Match Point, and that he hasn’t made a truly great film since 1989’s Crimes and Misdemeanors (though 1996’s Everyone Says I Love You is sorely underrated). Having been burned the past three years by the atrocious Vicky Christina Barcelona, and the cute-but-empty Whatever Works and You Will Meet A Tall Dark Stranger, I was hesitant to see the newest entry to the oeuvre. But the rave reviews poured in, and as the opening sequence (a fully lit love letter to Paris not unlike his similar ode to his former mistress, the intro to 1979’s Manhattan) played out, I could see why. It was Woody being true to form. His characters skewered the pseudo-intellectuals he’s hated since he pulled Marshall McLuhan from behind a poster in Annie Hall, while turning a few of the jabs at his younger self. You see, Midnight In Paris isn’t the typical examination of love that Woody’s churned out for years. No, rather how Annie Hall analyzed our relationship with others, and Crimes and Misdemeanors analyzed our relationship with God (or morality), Midnight in Paris (in a much lighter fashion) analyzes our relationship with the past. The Golden Age Woody used to kvetching-ly long for seems to have faded for him, as he realizes nostalgia is more a self-deluding prison than a cute little hobby. Midnight in Paris remains one of the most creative and fun films of the year, without sacrificing any of its intelligence to entertain.
Someday, Woody Allen will allow a man to walk with his hands out of his pockets. Some day. |
3.) Cave of Forgotten Dreams (Dir. Werner Herzog; Documentary; U.S./U.K./Canada/France/Germany)
Ah, yes. 3D movies. Leave it to acclaimed filmmaker Werner Herzog, master of such cinematic spectacles as Fitzcarraldo and Rescue Dawn, as well as somber, meditative pieces like Strozek and Grizzly Man, to find the true potential of the third dimension. Granted unprecedented (yet still severely limited) access to the famous Chauvet-Pont-d'Arc Cave in southern France, which contains the oldest cave paintings to have been discovered to date and have only been seen by select members of the scientific and archeological field, Herzog uses a 3-D camera to invite the audience to see what he himself saw, to witness every crack and crevice in the wall, and to feel the urge to reach out and touch what hasn’t been touched in thousands of years. In typical Herzog fashion, he takes a subject most would only have a passing interest in (in this case, old cave paintings) and not only finds a way to make it visually engaging but also, using his bleak narrative voice, finds a story within the walls of the cave that is both compelling and beautiful (the title Cave of Forgotten Dreams already proves Herzog isn’t just out to show pretty pictures). While it is common for documentaries on foreign locales to make the viewer long to be there, after viewing Herzog’s film, one feels as though they already were there, standing alongside the crew as they gazed at the hand painted walls, the fog of their breath grazing the stampeding buffalo frozen in time on the cold stone. Herzog breaks up the footage of the caves with interviews, mostly scientists commenting on how the cave came to be perfectly preserved, and aerial shots of the Pont d’Arc where Herzog’s somber German accent nails home the idea that these walls, these paintings frozen forever within the confines of the cave, represent a world we will never know, and yet provide a gateway to imagine the people who lived in that world. Never has a cinematic spectacle been so serene and introspective.
Herzog's documentaries are so much more relaxing when the "bear on man massacres" are minimal. |
Those who haven’t seen it deride The Artist being a silent film as a “gimmick” (before they go back to lamenting that Drive and Fast Five were robbed of Oscar nods in favor of the film). Yet to take in The Artist in theatres (which I highly recommend. Particularly for New Yorkers, the old-school style of the Paris Theatre on West 58th Street give the film-going experience an additional air of nostalgia), one realizes that the medium of silent film was chosen for the same reason Alan Moore chose the comic book (now called a “graphic novel”) to tell his landmark story Watchmen; because it was the best medium with which to tell the story. Before The Artist, the best film to deal with the era of silent pictures was a Technicolor musical (1952’s classic Singin’ in the Rain), and yet even that film, for all its mastery, couldn’t capture the excitement of silent films, an excitement nearly impossible to raise in an audience so used to sound. Even classic silent pictures like Modern Times or The Passion of Joan of Arc can’t capture an average audience’s attention. So it is a testament to the boldness and skill of director Michel Hazanavicius (who came to small international attention with 2006’s OSS 117: Cairo, Nest of Spies which also starred both The Artist’s leads) that The Artist is receiving acclaim both from critics and the public alike. The film is so light-hearted that its lead, the superb Jean Dujardin, seems at times to dance on air, and certain moments (like Peppy playing with George’s jacket, Jack’s run for help, and of course the “leg dance” scene) are so well done as to feel like iconic scenes of classic silent cinema, as though Hazanavicius lifted them from a past film rather than write them himself (And on the subject of Hazanavicius “lifting things from other films”, shut up, Kim Novack). In fact, that’s where The Artist truly succeeds. Its style, its brilliant performances (It takes a film where characters espouse that silent film acting is “easier” than having to talk to prove the opposite is true), and its overall warmth make it instantly feel as though The Artist has been a classic for decades, a long-lost silent era gem only recently unearthed. Yes, it looks as though it’s going to sweep the awards this year, and it damn well should.
Our hands are open. Just drop those Oscars right in 'em. |
In a year that brought big-budget entries from big names like Scorsese, Allen, Clooney, Payne and Fincher, it’s definitely a shock that the most thrilling and unique film came from a no name director on a shoe-string budget. Written, directed, and starring Evan Glodell, Bellflower is the breath of fresh air cinema so truly needed. The film captures the apathetic hipster generation with the same skill as Kerouac captured his, with characters who feel so real its as though the viewer simply stumbled into a house party right in the center of Suburbia, USA. The film is unlike anything ever seen before, in part due to what is actually being seen. Bellflower’s distinct look comes from the Coatwolf Model II, a camera built by Glodell’s production company (Coatwolf Productions) specifically for the film. The film distorts color, feels burned and scarred, and perfectly captures the emotion of the directionless Woodrow as he drifts through his life. The cast is stellar, and the story is brilliantly compelling without falling prey to the tropes and idioms of the “mumble-core” genre it’s been repeatedly lumped into. Anyone who came of age in the lethargic first decade of the new millennium will recognize these flannel-draped lost boys. You had class with them, you smoked pot with them, or you were them. Like the youth of the 60’s were Ben and Elaine in The Graduate, and the teens of the 80’s were all in The Breakfast Club, it is the fate of my generation that we all resides in the distorted, burned sepia world of Bellflower Avenue. Though perhaps not the most accessible film of the year, it is the one with the most distinct voice, the most unique vision, and the most satisfying catharsis. If Glodell never makes another film, he’s still a master of the art form for this brilliant piece.
This is Evan Glodell, having just murdered all your preconceptions of indie cinema. |
All the other "Bests" of the Year:
Best Director of the Year:
Michel Hazanavicius for The Artist
Though part of me wanted to give this to Bellflower’s Evan Glodell, my admiration for the sheer pair of steel couilles it took for Hazanavicius to make a silent film in 2011, as well as the mastery with which he did it, earns Hazanavicius the title of the year’s best director. The man’s a strong talent who’s skill is evolving in leaps and bounds. I’m certain we’ll be seeing even more of him in the future, and I can’t wait.Michel Hazanavicius for The Artist
Runner-Up: Evan Glodell for Bellflower
Best Screenplay of the Year:
Woody Allen for Midnight In Paris
Woody Allen for Midnight In Paris
Every major award can’t be wrong, right? Allen’s best script in decades already received heaps of praise when the film came in my #4 for best of the year, so there’s nothing more to say here other than “Good to have you back, sir.”
Runner-Up: Michel Hazanavicius for The Artist
Best Cinematography of the Year:
Joel Hodge for Bellflower
Joel Hodge for Bellflower
Hodge(left) with Glodell |
Runner-Up: Manuel Alberto Claro for Melancholia
Best Editing of the Year:
Evan Glodell, Joel Hodge, Jonathan Keevil, Vincent Grashaw for Bellflower
Evan Glodell, Joel Hodge, Jonathan Keevil, Vincent Grashaw for Bellflower
I couldn't find a picture of all of them, so here's Evan Glodell looking badass. |
Runner-Up: Zachary Stuart-Pontier for Martha Marcy May Marlene
Best Score of the Year:
Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross for The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross for The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
Two men. Not one ounce of joy between them. |
Runner-Up: Ludovic Bource for The Artist
Best Actor of the Year:
Michael Fassbender as Brandon Sullivan in Shame
In an otherwise forgettable film, Fassbender (who owned this year in cinema with this, A Dangerous Method and X-Men: First Class) shone in a flawless performance as Brandon, a slave to his overactive libido. Even when the film takes absurd turns, Fassbender sells it so strong and so genuine that one cannot help but believe it. Severely stiffed in this year’s awards race, it’s undeniable the stellar caliber of Fassbender’s performance, the kind one rarely sees in film anymore.Michael Fassbender as Brandon Sullivan in Shame
Runner-Up: Jean Dujardin as George Valentine in The Artist
Best Actress of the Year:
Elizabeth Olsen as Martha in Martha Marcy May Marlene
Elizabeth Olsen as Martha in Martha Marcy May Marlene
Olsen’s film debut is a bold, heart-wrenching performance that far exceeds and “Hollywood heartbreaker” you can throw out there. The tortured Martha is lost to us, lost within herself, and that’s just what makes her so compelling. The film hinges on this performance, and without an actress as strong as Olsen it would crumble. But like the Coatwolf crew behind the camera, Olsen is a well-needed breath of fresh air, a new actress who’s not a starlet, not afraid to bear her soul, and to dive into deep parts without an ounce of reserve.
Runner-Up: Kirsten Dunst as Justine in Melancholia
Best Supporting Actor of the Year:
Tom Hiddleston as Loki in Thor
Tom Hiddleston as Loki in Thor
Yeah, yeah. I know it’s a superhero film. I know about Christopher Plummer. Yes, I’m sure Warrior is an underrated film. But let’s take a minute to appreciate that Hiddleston (who also appears in Midnight in Paris as F. Scott Fitzgerald and War Horse as Captain Nicholls) takes on a mythological character and plays him with both a grandiosity and a human sensibility (a delicate balance, one can appreciate, after seeing a few failed productions of The Tempest). The entirety of Thor’s Asgard scenes (also known as the only enjoyable scenes) take on a Shakespearian air, and as such Hiddleston sells it better than any supporting performance getting awards nods this year. Plus, let’s face it, he outshines Anthony Hopkins. This is no easy feat.
Runner-Up: John Hawkes in Martha Marcy May Marlene
Best Supporting Actress of the Year:
Melissa McCarthy as Megan in Bridesmaids
Oh, if the pretentious were pissed about Hiddleston, their blood has to be boiling now. I’m sorry, but a great, scene-stealing comedic performance has to be acknowledged, and I haven’t seen one this strong since Robert Downey Jr. in Tropic Thunder, or perhaps as far back as Kevin Kline in A Fish Called Wanda. McCarthy became a star with this role, and it’s undoubtedly the most memorable supporting performance of the year.Melissa McCarthy as Megan in Bridesmaids
Runner-Up: Berenice Bejo as Peppy Miller in The Artist
Best Ensemble Cast of the Year:
Carnage
This forgettable Polanski adaptation of the play God of Carnage did have a stellar cast. Yes, Christoph Waltz is easily the weakest of the four, but in a cast of Kate Winslet, Jodie Foster, and the always great John C. Reilly, that’s good company to be weak in. Of the four, it’s Rielly and Foster who really shine, but the cast plays off of each other brilliantly, and were it not for their considerable skill, the film would go from forgettable to unwatchable.Carnage
Runner-Up: Bellflower
Breakout Performance of the Year:
Uggie for Jack in The Artist
The fact that there was a movement to get him an Oscar nod says something, doesn’t it? I know there has to be scoffs from those who have yet to see The Artist, but before you go smirking your pretentious smirks, see the film. Uggie steals every scene, and there hasn’t been a finer animal performance since Rin Tin Tin (a contender for the original Best Actor prize, according to Susan Orlean). Hell, there’s been more talk about Uggie than his co-star Berenice Bejo, who actually received a nomination. Though retiring, Uggie has earned his place in cinema history, even if he doesn’t know it.Uggie for Jack in The Artist
Runner-Up: Elizabeth Olsen for Martha in Martha Marcy May Marlene
Most Overrated Films of the Year:
Drive & The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
Here we have two pieces of ultra-violent, ultra-sleek film candy that critics seems to think were masterpieces. Both are lifeless, vacant “thrill-rides” that have nothing below the surface but a visceral appeal, and if that’s what they’re accepted as, well, mazel tov. But instead, critics jumped on these films as though they were the second coming, and I can already see the internet comments for dissing GWTDT (I prefer the Swedish version), a film that has proven to be this year’s “that film”, one that is deemed perfect by it’s die-hard fan base, who refuse to listen to any argument that the film might have any fault at all (for an example of this phenomena in other films, try explaining to the Nolan leg-humpers that the math at the end of The Dark Knight doesn’t make sense.) After promising character studies from Drive’s Nicolas Winding Refn and GWTDT’s David Fincher (Bronson & The Social Network, respectively), these vapid let-downs will likely be seen for what they are once the hype dies down. As for where all that hype will go next? Well, The Hunger Games and The Dark Knight Rises, have fun dealing those fans.Drive & The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
Most Underrated Films of the Year:
Cars 2 & Bellflower
Cars 2 & Bellflower
Two films, underrated in two different ways. Bellflower simply failed to be on many people’s radar this year, but I’ve explained its merits enough in prior entries to this article, so I’ll take this time to talk about Cars 2. Dear critics and bloggers, Cars 2 is not the antichrist. I know this may shock you, given your reactions, and the copious amounts of venom you spit on it, but it’s not. Is it great? No. Did it deserve an Oscar nod? No. It was simple kids flick fare. Simple, forgettable kids flick fare that every production company is guilty of, even Disney. I’ve never understood all the hate, though. Nobody spits that kind of loathing at, say, Puss In Boots. Remember Meet The Robinsons? Neither do I. How about Rio? Nope. Both films were worse than Cars 2, so why were they not publicly crucified? Ah, yes. Because it’s Pixar. You’re all disappointed in Pixar. Many have said it, that it’s “beneath Pixar”, or that “Pixar let them down”, which is why Cars 2 gets an F, whereas had, say, Dreamworks made it, it probably would have gotten a C. It’s well animated, it tells the same typical story 1,001 kids films tell. So the only reason for its unrepentant revilement, as opposed to simple disinterest, is that fact that it’s made by Pixar. But where is the logic in that? Imagine if two students handed in papers of equal quality. Not great, but below average papers, both the same quality, and would normally receive the same grade. Except, in this case, the teacher goes “Bobby, you normally produce C papers, and this is no different, another C. But Billy, while this paper would get a C if anybody else did it, your papers are usually A+ level, therefore this paper will get an F, since I expected so much more from you.” So, come on, guys. A C paper is a C paper no matter who wrote it. And an ok film is an ok film, even if it is from the Toy Story guys.
10 Best Film Moments of the Year (regardless of the film’s quality as a whole):
There’s a shit-ton of spoilers here. Just saying. Also, unlike the last one, this one’s done from #1-#10, because if I started with my #10 pick, you’d all stop reading and judge me. Aaaaaand I don't own any of the clips I embedded here, nor do I own any of the above images.
1.) The opening credits to The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
The best moment in film this year might also be the most ill-fitting. No, this bizarre stylized opening (not counting an idiotically brief clip with Christopher Plummer) doesn’t really fit with the film as well as it could have, but it looks really, really cool. So does the rest of the film, but while “looking really, really cool” isn’t enough to redeem a whole film (unless you go by what every critic seems to think of this flick), it certainly works for a credits sequence.
2.) George and Peppy’s “legs only” dance in The Artist
Like I said above, this scene is so brilliantly done it feels like an iconic scene we’ve known for years, and will likely become that very iconic scene we’ll remember till we’re old and grey. And even then, we’ll still be loving The Artist.
3.) The overture to Melancholia
One of the most gorgeous 8 minutes of cinema since the opening of Manhattan, I dubbed this film’s intro an overture, because there’s no other way to describe it. Von Trier crafted a visual overture to his film, containing all the themes and motifs without giving anything away. Beautiful, masterful, and unforgettable.
4.) Eric goes Nazi hunting in X-Men: First Class
It’s Inglourious Basterds meets James Bond in this stellar moment from X-Men: First Class as Eric searches for his mother’s killer. The multilingual Fassbender owns this scene as strong as any in Shame or A Dangerous Method, and finally gets to do the kick-ass Nazi killing he was deprived of in his Tarantino debut.
<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/26406532?title=0&byline=0&portrait=0&color=80ceff" width="450" height="338" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
5.) Woodrow’s rampage in Bellflower
We don’t have the actual scene here, just the ending which shows clips, but even so, it’s worth it to watch the whole film. As the film derails (or picks up, depending on your perspective), you question whether it’s all a dream, what does it all mean, and how can something so bleak, beautiful and captivating come from a group of guys with $17,000.
6.) “No!” from Rise of the Planet of the Apes
And now, a dramatic re-enactment of any person viewing this scene during Rise of the Planet of the Apes:
Viewer: This is an alright movie. Kinda slow. Is that the kid from Harry Potter?
Dodge: Take your stinking paw off me you damn dirty ape!
Viewer: Oh god, did they just do that? I was really hoping they wouldn’t do something lame like that and…
Caesar: No!
Viewer: …whoa, shit just got real.
7.) The Spirit of the West appears in Rango
If Hunter S. Thompson’s cameo didn’t make you think this film was for adults as much as kids, this had to do it for you. One of the most clever jokes in one of the most clever films of the year, the “Spirit of the West” sure looks a lot like Clint Eastwood. Sounds a lot like him too. And apparently they used to call him the “Man With No Name”. Fun fact: That guy doing the voice? That’s Deadwood’s Timothy Olyphant.
8.) “I never said I was in your closet!” from Scream 4
After Last House on the Left, The Hills Have Eyes, Nightmare on Elm Street and Scream, Wes Craven was undoubtedly the master of horror. After Scream 3 and My Soul To Take, there were some considerable doubts. And while the decidedly average Scream 4 seemed only to prove that the Ghostface franchise was dead in the water, this one scene proved ol’ Grandpa Wes has still got a few moves in him.
9.) The first getaway drive in Drive
This film had such promise. Before the GTA Vice City-esque credits, and the so-overdone-it’s-painful storyline, Drive featured a brilliant opening sequence showing what Ryan Gosling’s character normally does (and should have done the whole movie), which is be a brilliant getaway driver. This scene had a clever tension the film soon traded for fork-stabbings and clichés, but a least for this scene, Drive is a engaging and unique film.
10.) “I Want To Hold Your Hand” in Glee: The 3D Concert Film
Yes, detractors, sharpen your knives now. I’m sure you’d prefer I used this space from some car chase from Fast Five, or some “moving” speech from The Help, or the horse breaking that rock or whatever in War Horse. But in a year so musically dry for cinema that there’s only two songs nominated for Best Original Song this year (and neither is very good), ad not a movie-musical to be found, any bit of good singing is welcome. Now, look, Glee: The 3D Concert Movie isn’t exactly The Last Waltz or Madonna: Truth or Dare (though judging by some of the camera movements and shot choices, you can tell the cinematographer Glen MacPherson watched the former*). However, it is part of a new wave of 3D concert films, and compared to its predecessors (Hannah Montana & Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert and Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert Experience), this one shows vast improvement cinematography-wise. The 3D is no longer being used to pander to pre-teens who want to touch their favorite stars, but rather just to enhance the viewing experience. Granted, that 3D would be better used on Springsteen or U2 than some of the moments in Glee, since some of its cast do seem to benefit greatly from studio augmentation. However, there is one shining moment in the otherwise “for fans only” Glee film. When the show’s breakout star, Chris Colfer, takes the stage to perform the Across The Universe take on “I Want to Hold Your Hand”, he not only out-performs Evan Rachel Wood, he out-performs himself from the show. It’s interesting to watch him feed off of the crowd, take control of the stage (the boy can sure as shit sing, his quality of performance alone being half the reason it’s #10). But what fascinates me most is that Colfer is, for all intents and purposes, a Broadway/Cabaret singer, in the vein of Streisand or Menzel. To look at Colfer’s face during his performance, you watch as, while touching hands, he realizes he owns this song (or at least this ballad-style version of it) the way Johnny Cash owned “Hurt”, or the way Hendrix owned “All Along the Watchtower”. Before this performance, even in previous concerts (check the bootlegs), he was just singing a song. But in this film, he owns it as “his signature song”, the kind all Broadway and cabaret divas have. Just think how great it would have been to have on video the first time Streisand really made “Don’t Rain on My Parade” her own, or the first time Idina Menzel belted out the final notes of “Defying Gravity” with the gravitas that says “This is mine”. With Colfer, we have that. He owns that song, that stage, and the whole damn film it’s on, and it’s the best cinematic musical performance of the year.
Yeah, a whole paragraph to justify it to you, dear reader, you probably still don’t like it. Well, then, just pretend it’s the Top 9.
The video’s not online, but here’s the audio. Kid fucking kills it. Listen to those screams. He’ll be stuck with this song for decades.
*I assume director Kevin Tancharoen was too busy planning his Mortal Kombat movie to watch The Last Waltz. Because fresh off the Glee movie, he’s making Mortal Kombat. This isn’t a joke.
No comments:
Post a Comment